Bhagavad-gītā 15.15
"...., By all the Vedas, I am to be known. Indeed, I am the compiler of Vedānta, and I am the knower of the Vedas".
Bahavath gita 9:17
".... I am also the Rig, the Säma and the Yajur Vedas".
- There is no single word called "Krishna" exist in any of three rig, yajur. and sama vedas..! then how do we believe its true?
- It can be true only if we understand GOD by his attributes and definitions that defined by his scriptures rather then by name.
- So just forget about all the name given in the vedas such as agni, indra, siva, vishnu, vayu and etc etc., know him as described by gita..
"... He(GOD) is unborn, eternal, ever-existing and primeval..". - gita 2:20
- This indicates the concept of "MONOTHEISM". Which is the same teachings of AL-Quran.
Say, "Allah[God] is One; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like unto Him. - (AlQuran Surat Al-'Ikhlāş 112.)
- The different name in veda and purana must be raised because of different language and different era because its the fact that RIG Veda itself written by 10 different authors at different period. Huge time gap exists between every sacred books.
- People changes from time to time but not GOD, so its better to know him by his attributes.
- As i understood QURAN is the recent revelation by god almighty and he chooses his name as ALLAH that holds the very same definition of his attributes. and all veda/scriptures are his and all name mentioned in that was his, and he rejected those because people has given those the name to the creations.
conclusion:
- if i accept gita is given by the god who gave all vedas, why i should not accept quran is given by the same god. because i see significant number of similarities, signs, peace among them!
- Many blames muslims, but i see the teachings, not the followers. because as a follower, i made mistake when i was hindu, and i make even now as a muslim. if one can be so pure and holy, what is the need of religion and guidance?
- Many blames the teachings of quran, but i see the logic behind it ans none of the scripture is exceptional in it.
- Many see blames the prophet saw, but i look at those people who is lack in the knowledge of islam. He is outstanding personalty i ever red about, written by many non-Muslim legends.
Note:
- The reason we avoid atharvana is, gita itself not recognizing it in 9:17, and its mentioned nowhere else in the entire bahavathgita. the reason may be either it must reveled before atharvana or it must not be the veda. but i see it in commentary where the scholars added it wherever the veda mentioned in gita.
- Example of Metaphorical work : the attached picture is a versus of gita in the original lyrics there is no word mentioned called "krishna" but in commentary he says its all talking about him only. i strongly object its a metaphorical and misinterpretation of a scripture. if this is possible in the era, everything is so transparent, how can i believe there was no misinterpretation or addition or deletion done into old scripture which has no clear evidence of its origin.
Ref :
1) http://www.ulc.org/wp-content/uploads/
2) http://www.mayapurworldwide.org/pdf/
3) http://eternalreligion.org/wp-content/
4) http://www.scribd.com/doc/206030333/
5) https://www.youtube.com/
6) http://www.islamawareness.net/Hinduism/
7) https://answers.yahoo.com/question/
8) http://www.attachowk.com/
9) http://gita-blog.blogspot.in/2010/11/
10) http://www.jagatgururampalji.org/
11) http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/gita/
12) http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/gita/
Photo: I had a Question on a versus of GITA.!
Bhagavad-gītā 15.15
"...., By all the Vedas, I am to be known. Indeed, I am the compiler of Vedānta, and I am the knower of the Vedas".
Bahavath gita 9:17
".... I am also the Rig, the Säma and the Yajur Vedas".
- There is no single word called "Krishna" exist in any of three rig, yajur. and sama vedas..! then how do we believe its true?
- It can be true only if we understand GOD by his attributes and definitions that defined by his scriptures rather then by name.
- So just forget about all the name given in the vedas such as agni, indra, siva, vishnu, vayu and etc etc., know him as described by gita..
"... He(GOD) is unborn, eternal, ever-existing and primeval..". - gita 2:20
- This indicates the concept of "MONOTHEISM". Which is the same teachings of AL-Quran.
Say, "Allah[God] is One; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like unto Him. - (AlQuran Surat Al-'Ikhlāş 112.)
- The different name in veda and purana must be raised because of different language and different era because its the fact that RIG Veda itself written by 10 different authors at different period. Huge time gap exists between every sacred books.
- People changes from time to time but not GOD, so its better to know him by his attributes.
- As i understood QURAN is the recent revelation by god almighty and he chooses his name as ALLAH that holds the very same definition of his attributes. and all veda/scriptures are his and all name mentioned in that was his, and he rejected those because people has given those the name to the creations.
conclusion:
- if i accept gita is given by the god who gave all vedas, why i should not accept quran is given by the same god. because i see significant number of similarities, signs, peace among them!
- Many blames muslims, but i see the teachings, not the followers. because as a follower, i made mistake when i was hindu, and i make even now as a muslim. if one can be so pure and holy, what is the need of religion and guidance?
- Many blames the teachings of quran, but i see the logic behind it ans none of the scripture is exceptional in it.
- Many see blames the prophet saw, but i look at those people who is lack in the knowledge of islam. He is outstanding personalty i ever red about, written by many non-Muslim legends.
Note:
- The reason we avoid atharvana is, gita itself not recognizing it in 9:17, and its mentioned nowhere else in the entire bahavathgita. the reason may be either it must reveled before atharvana or it must not be the veda. but i see it in commentary where the scholars added it wherever the veda mentioned in gita.
- Example of Metaphorical work : the attached picture is a versus of gita in the original lyrics there is no word mentioned called "krishna" but in commentary he says its all talking about him only. i strongly object its a metaphorical and misinterpretation of a scripture. if this is possible in the era, everything is so transparent, how can i believe there was no misinterpretation or addition or deletion done into old scripture which has no clear evidence of its origin.
Ref :
1) http://www.ulc.org/wp-content/uploads/
2) http://www.mayapurworldwide.org/pdf/
3) http://eternalreligion.org/wp-content/
4) http://www.scribd.com/doc/206030333/
5) https://www.youtube.com/
6) http://www.islamawareness.net/Hinduism/
7) https://answers.yahoo.com/question/
8) http://www.attachowk.com/
9) http://gita-blog.blogspot.in/2010/11/
10) http://www.jagatgururampalji.org/
11) http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/gita/
12) http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/gita/
